HOME ARTICLES JOIN GALLERY STORE SPONSORS MARKETPLACE CONTACT US  
Register | FAQ | Search | Memberlist
Username:    Password:       Forgot your password?
BIKELAND > FORUMS > ZX-14.com > Thread: 190/50 vs. 190/55 NEW TOPIC NEW POLL POST REPLY
joemugg


Expert Class
Posts: 109
posted October 08, 2009 12:20 PM        
190/50 vs. 190/55

I've heard a lot of riders install a 55 series rear to increase the turn-in character of their bike. What about lowering the front instead? A 55 rear is 9.5mm taller than a 50 rear (190/50=95 190/55=104.5) so would lowering the front 9.5mm yield the same result?
____________
'06 ZX14 blue, Muzzy M14/M10, flies out, BMC filter, PCIII, SpeedoHealer, Scott's Steering Damper, 16 tooth Vortex
'97 GSXR600 street sweeper

  Ignore this member   
eklipse636


Needs a life
ZX-14
Posts: 6046
posted October 08, 2009 01:08 PM        
No. Lowering the front end will decrease your turning radius.
____________
Best: 60ft 1.351 1/8 5.68 mph 123.98 1/4
8.89 mph 151.32

  Ignore this member   
masszx14


Pro
A mind beside itself!
Posts: 1806
posted October 08, 2009 01:22 PM        
Increasing height improves lean angle (well- gives you more of).
Same with tires profile and suspensions settings.
I would never use anything else but a 190/55 rear on my 14.
____________
universal@mind

  Ignore this member   
joemugg


Expert Class
Posts: 109
posted October 08, 2009 02:31 PM        
Oh yeah, good point. I was thinking of rake without considering ride height.
____________
'06 ZX14 blue, Muzzy M14/M10, flies out, BMC filter, PCIII, SpeedoHealer, Scott's Steering Damper, 16 tooth Vortex
'97 GSXR600 street sweeper

  Ignore this member   
derpie


Expert Class
Dont judge a book by its cover
Posts: 269
posted October 08, 2009 04:19 PM        
quote:
Increasing height improves lean angle (well- gives you more of).
Same with tires profile and suspensions settings.
I would never use anything else but a 190/55 rear on my 14.


Isn't the 55 narrower than the 50 ?

  Ignore this member   
joemugg


Expert Class
Posts: 109
posted October 08, 2009 04:34 PM        
No, the first number is the width, the second number is the sidewall height represented as a percentage of tread width, 50% or 55% of 190mm. So they're both the same width, different heights.
____________
'06 ZX14 blue, Muzzy M14/M10, flies out, BMC filter, PCIII, SpeedoHealer, Scott's Steering Damper, 16 tooth Vortex
'97 GSXR600 street sweeper

  Ignore this member   
eklipse636


Needs a life
ZX-14
Posts: 6046
posted October 08, 2009 04:46 PM        
Dosent it come w a 50?
____________
Best: 60ft 1.351 1/8 5.68 mph 123.98 1/4
8.89 mph 151.32

  Ignore this member   
masszx14


Pro
A mind beside itself!
Posts: 1806
posted October 08, 2009 07:04 PM        
quote:
Dosent it come w a 50?


It comes in the wrong size and the wrong brand/ model IMHO

You don't ride twisties, you would have noticed a big improvement
with the 190/55 if you did.
____________
universal@mind

  Ignore this member   
INTIMIDA2OR


Needs a life
RED rider!
Posts: 13081
posted October 09, 2009 12:53 AM        
quote:
quote:
Dosent it come w a 50?


It comes in the wrong size and the wrong brand/ model IMHO

You don't ride twisties, you would have noticed a big improvement
with the 190/55 if you did.

I agree! I run the 190/55 and I used to drag the lower fairings with the 50 profile and and I dragged the lowers with the with the 180/55 . Haven't been able to drag the lowers with the 190/55. Seems to be the perfect tire for twisties on this bike

____________
'06 Passion Red ZX-14



*Lee*

  Ignore this member   
eklipse636


Needs a life
ZX-14
Posts: 6046
posted October 09, 2009 03:41 AM        
i dont do twisties, so ill stay where im at.
____________
Best: 60ft 1.351 1/8 5.68 mph 123.98 1/4
8.89 mph 151.32

  Ignore this member   
14nooby


Zone Head
Posts: 987
posted October 09, 2009 03:49 AM        
If you drag race the 190/55 is no good. I just ran into that problem because it rubbed my inner fender really bad.
  Ignore this member   
eklipse636


Needs a life
ZX-14
Posts: 6046
posted October 09, 2009 04:12 AM        
i actually am getting a 180/55. i hope it dont rub..
____________
Best: 60ft 1.351 1/8 5.68 mph 123.98 1/4
8.89 mph 151.32

  Ignore this member   
joemugg


Expert Class
Posts: 109
posted October 09, 2009 06:38 AM        
Anyone know the equivalent gear change when switching to a 190/55 rear? It would be like going to a smaller rear sprocket, but how much smaller?
____________
'06 ZX14 blue, Muzzy M14/M10, flies out, BMC filter, PCIII, SpeedoHealer, Scott's Steering Damper, 16 tooth Vortex
'97 GSXR600 street sweeper

  Ignore this member   
masszx14


Pro
A mind beside itself!
Posts: 1806
posted October 09, 2009 06:39 AM        
180x0.55=99

190x0.50=95

190x0.55=104.5
____________
universal@mind

  Ignore this member   
14nooby


Zone Head
Posts: 987
posted October 09, 2009 06:39 AM        
It shouldn't run Dusty. I went to Cycle Gear yesterday and compared the 190/50 Shinko to the 180/55 Michelin and they are really close in height. I'm going to the track tonight for the first time with my 180 also. Hope it doesn't rub to.
  Ignore this member   
Shane661


Needs a life
Posts: 11494
posted October 09, 2009 06:43 AM        Edited By: Shane661 on 9 Oct 2009 14:47
By switching to a taller rear tire, you are changing the effective rake and trail. In this case, it will steer more agressively, at the cost of some stability. I wouldn't alter the steering geometry like this without installing a damper.

In order to know the actual affect on gearing you would have to measure the two tires when installed on the rim. In this case, you will most likely be looking at the equvalent of a tooth or more.

In regards to a shorter front tire, it will also make the bike steer more quickly, for the above mentioned reasons. I am not great with math, so I can't tell you what change in the front equals what change in the rear, I'm afraid. But it is possible to calculate this with some geometry skills.

Shane

  Ignore this member   
eklipse636


Needs a life
ZX-14
Posts: 6046
posted October 09, 2009 07:42 AM        
I failed geomotry in 10th grade. I'm useless in that category
____________
Best: 60ft 1.351 1/8 5.68 mph 123.98 1/4
8.89 mph 151.32

  Ignore this member   
gilberjj


Needs a job
Friend of Fast
Posts: 3196
posted October 09, 2009 07:55 AM        
I put on a 55 rear and it was glorious in the corners. If you ride twisties a lot, I would highly recommend it.
  Ignore this member   
joemugg


Expert Class
Posts: 109
posted October 09, 2009 10:43 AM        
Adam at Vortex says its similar to one tooth down on the rear, approximately 2%. Shane, what gearing and tire size do you run for LSR? What's your top speed so far?
____________
'06 ZX14 blue, Muzzy M14/M10, flies out, BMC filter, PCIII, SpeedoHealer, Scott's Steering Damper, 16 tooth Vortex
'97 GSXR600 street sweeper

  Ignore this member   
Shane661


Needs a life
Posts: 11494
posted October 09, 2009 11:32 AM        
quote:
Shane, what gearing and tire size do you run for LSR? What's your top speed so far?


I run a 190/50 tire. As far as gearing, it depends on the distance of the venue and what I feel the peak speed will be. I have run everything from 16/41 to 17/38. My top speed is 211.97 mph, which was obtained with 1.5 miles of track and a tailwind.

Shane

  Ignore this member   
joemugg


Expert Class
Posts: 109
posted October 09, 2009 01:52 PM        
Damn! That's fast. How far from stock is the motor?
____________
'06 ZX14 blue, Muzzy M14/M10, flies out, BMC filter, PCIII, SpeedoHealer, Scott's Steering Damper, 16 tooth Vortex
'97 GSXR600 street sweeper

  Ignore this member   
Shane661


Needs a life
Posts: 11494
posted October 09, 2009 02:01 PM        Edited By: Shane661 on 9 Oct 2009 22:02
quote:
Damn! That's fast. How far from stock is the motor?


Stock motor, with bolt-on mods and MR9 fuel.

  Ignore this member   
Fastest-14


Expert Class
Fastest -14
Posts: 354
posted October 09, 2009 02:14 PM        
Shane wasn't u the one who put the 4 mil crank with the stock bore in?
What was most effective in getting u past the 186 limiter?
Which gear ratio was u running when u ran 211 mph?

  Ignore this member   
Shane661


Needs a life
Posts: 11494
posted October 09, 2009 02:17 PM        
quote:
Shane wasn't u the one who put the 4 mil crank with the stock bore in?
What was most effective in getting u past the 186 limiter?
Which gear ratio was u running when u ran 211 mph?


No, my motor is stock with about 2500 miles on it. I have a speedohealier, but I will be removing it when convenient and grinding the countershaft nut, most likely. I had 17/38 on the bike...but it could have done it (and maybe a little more) with 17/39. I had to borrow the sprocket at the track.

Shane

  Ignore this member   
joemugg


Expert Class
Posts: 109
posted October 09, 2009 06:53 PM        
I'm curious, Shane, why dump the SH in favor of grinding the nut?
____________
'06 ZX14 blue, Muzzy M14/M10, flies out, BMC filter, PCIII, SpeedoHealer, Scott's Steering Damper, 16 tooth Vortex
'97 GSXR600 street sweeper

  Ignore this member   
All times are America/Va [ This thread is 2 pages long: 1  2     Next» ] < Previous Thread     Next Thread >
BIKELAND > FORUMS > ZX-14.com > Thread: 190/50 vs. 190/55 NEW TOPIC NEW POLL POST REPLY

FEATURED NEWS   Bikeland News RSS Feed

HEADLINES   Bikeland News RSS Feed


Copyright 2000-2026 Bikeland Media
Please refer to our terms of service for further information
0.80239295959473 seconds processing time