HOME ARTICLES JOIN GALLERY STORE SPONSORS MARKETPLACE CONTACT US  
Register | FAQ | Search | Memberlist
Username:    Password:       Forgot your password?
BIKELAND > FORUMS > DRAGBIKE ZONE.com > Thread: 520 conversion? NEW TOPIC NEW POLL POST REPLY
mrsantafe


Zone Head
Posts: 521
posted February 20, 2005 10:24 AM        
520 conversion?

I have read the tensil strength of some 520's are nearly as strong as the 530 chains. How much weight can be saved by this conversion? Will it hold up for normal usage.(limited to zero, drag racing)

  Ignore this member   
CrotchRocket


Moderator
Bracket Racing with Betsy
Posts: 8038
posted February 20, 2005 04:31 PM        
Dont know anyone that has done a 520 conversion on a 12 or Busa...They have too much torque...
____________
Jason Miller StreetBike Seminars

*****DragRacers do it better, because they dont cut Corners*****

  Ignore this member    Click here to visit CrotchRocket's homepage. 
TurboBlew


Moderator
BUSY DOING THE SCHIAVO
Posts: 4590
posted February 21, 2005 09:38 PM        
You'll save about 2lbs.
Should work fine up to 220hp.
____________
Official Charter Member of the RIDERS OF KAWASAKI MEMBERSHIP REVOCATION CLUB
Also a BadAss Internet Forum Moderator 4 Hire!! Come at me brah!

  Ignore this member   
Megabyte


Pro
Posts: 1047
posted February 22, 2005 10:15 AM        
quote:
Dont know anyone that has done a 520 conversion on a 12 or Busa...They have too much torque...


I believe Zhooligan was using a 520 setup, and he was making over 260 rwhp?

____________
We First make our habits and then our habits make us.

  Ignore this member   
mrsantafe


Zone Head
Posts: 521
posted March 06, 2005 01:01 PM        
any other comments?
  Ignore this member   
All times are America/Va < Previous Thread     Next Thread >
BIKELAND > FORUMS > DRAGBIKE ZONE.com > Thread: 520 conversion? NEW TOPIC NEW POLL POST REPLY

FEATURED NEWS   Bikeland News RSS Feed

HEADLINES   Bikeland News RSS Feed


Copyright 2000-2026 Bikeland Media
Please refer to our terms of service for further information
0.21568012237549 seconds processing time