HOME ARTICLES JOIN GALLERY STORE SPONSORS MARKETPLACE CONTACT US  
Register | FAQ | Search | Memberlist
Username:    Password:       Forgot your password?
BIKELAND > FORUMS > ZX-14.com > Thread: Which Year ZX-10??? NEW TOPIC NEW POLL POST REPLY
JSmooth


Expert Class
Posts: 169
posted February 02, 2011 10:31 PM        
Which Year ZX-10???

Which year of the ZX-10 do you all consider the best year ever for this bike and why?

  Ignore this member   
Hellmutt


Needs a job
Posts: 2013
posted February 03, 2011 05:44 AM        
Possibly next years model? Never had one of any year, but considering power / other options it's equipped with this year -- I'd vote for the 2012 only because they'll ( hopefully ) remedy the bugs / problems of this years redesigned model and make it right
____________
British flying couch with endtables and an orange thumper
________________________________________________

  Ignore this member    Click here to visit Hellmutt's homepage. 
kaw-rick


Pro
Posts: 1167
posted February 03, 2011 06:29 AM        
i really liked my 05. rode my brothers o6 and hated it. dont know about newer 10s.
  Ignore this member   
Quarter Pounder


Pro
with Cheese
Posts: 1069
posted February 03, 2011 07:15 AM        
04 original (new generation). Pretty raw bike with tons of attitude.
____________
SWB 2008 ZX-14
9.19 @ 151
5.98 @ 123
1.53 60'

  Ignore this member   
Big_T112


Pro
Posts: 1061
posted February 03, 2011 01:56 PM        
04-05 but they all have weak transmissions, Hopefully the new one will be better.
  Ignore this member   
indynic


Expert Class
Lil Show, Lil Go
Posts: 258
posted February 03, 2011 04:27 PM        
Really any year. The transmissions in the 06 on are definitely superior, so is the slipper clutch.
  Ignore this member   
K Bryant


Needs a job
Sponsor
Posts: 2911
posted February 03, 2011 05:26 PM        
Mirror the thread since you also posted in the ZX10 forum.
  Ignore this member    Click here to visit K Bryant's homepage. 
gilberjj


Needs a job
Friend of Fast
Posts: 3196
posted February 03, 2011 10:33 PM        
I've always liked therawness of the 04-05
  Ignore this member   
zixxer14


Pro
Damn that was Quick
Posts: 1233
posted February 04, 2011 07:43 AM        
Hey Kerry welcome back, haven't seen you here in awhile, too busy building pipes lately?
I'm for the early ones, 04-5, more power & raucous feel. Besides it's cheaper to fix suspension than make power.

  Ignore this member    Click here to visit zixxer14's homepage. 
K Bryant


Needs a job
Sponsor
Posts: 2911
posted February 04, 2011 09:09 AM        Edited By: K Bryant on 4 Feb 2011 17:12
quote:
Hey Kerry welcome back, haven't seen you here in awhile, too busy building pipes lately? .


Thanx. Yep, always running WFO. Obviously that's a good thing!

Ok since it hasn't been mirrored yet to the same question on the ZX10 forum, here's what I stated:

quote:
I had an original 1989 offering of the ZX10 (started in '88). It set a nasty standard but I would hesitate to call it a "sportbike". Probably more of a sport/touring. None-the-less, excellent bike, but it was a tank. Loved it and kept mine for many years.

The new release in '04 set another standard of nastiness and cool styling. Definetly a sportbike. Big power, lightweight, decent handling, and fast in the right hands. Brakes were a little weak. I really like the style of it as well (and black of course was the nastiest of them all). Still have mine and probably won't part with it.

The change for the 06-07 model was a step backwards. Tamer, heavier, styling left a lot to be desired, dual undertail mufflers (yuk....). It was somewhat of a subjective mistake...

The 08-10 model was much improved. Essentially a better version of the '04-05. More power, better handling, better brakes. Really a nice package. Styling was improved as well, but still not as nasty looking as the 04-05 model. Turn signals on the mirror stalks though.... Not too sure about that one. Almost added one to the personal collection.

The '11 model just really seems to have brought the entire ZX10 package together. Power and technology seem to work in harmony and your able to take advantage of all of it. Styling looks very nice. It appears to have caught up and evolved into the bike every Kawasaki guy expects for a 2011 purchase consideration. I would really like to add one to the personal stable.

  Ignore this member    Click here to visit K Bryant's homepage. 
JSmooth


Expert Class
Posts: 169
posted February 27, 2011 04:34 PM        
K Bryant, thanks for the insight I was really looking at the 04-05 model as well as the 2010 model, something about having a 10r that can scream along with a 14 that says come catch me just says it all for me. I think I will try to find me one of those years and go from there. I recently found a 2003 ZX-12r and passed up on it even though it had very low miles and adult driven. Now I think I should've got it. LOL!!!
  Ignore this member   
eklipse636


Needs a life
ZX-14
Posts: 6046
posted February 27, 2011 04:50 PM        
If you got a 14, why buy a 12?
____________
Best: 60ft 1.351 1/8 5.68 mph 123.98 1/4
8.89 mph 151.32

  Ignore this member   
Shane661


Needs a life
Posts: 11494
posted February 27, 2011 04:54 PM        Edited By: Shane661 on 28 Feb 2011 01:27
quote:
If you got a 14, why buy a 12?


The 12R has a lot to offer if you like high rpm power....it has a better cylinder head, hotter cams, and 46mm throttle bodies, standard...



I love my 1287...it spins to 12k+ rpm...and it will wallop a stock motor 14, power-wise...it's not quite stock, though.

Shane

  Ignore this member   
JSmooth


Expert Class
Posts: 169
posted February 27, 2011 07:18 PM        
That is a plus to one of the reasons as to why I would want a 12, another is because I have always wanted one. Other then that it is not a necessity just a want. It's kind of like my C-10, I own a SS Chevy Silverado but went and bought the C-10 and worked on it for years to get it back to Show quality.
  Ignore this member   
SteveWFL


Moderator
Posts: 27920
posted February 28, 2011 09:10 PM        
quote:
Which year of the ZX-10 do you all consider the best year ever for this bike and why?


2011
____________
2010 Concours14
'08 R1 YAMAHA
ZX14 gone!
CBR600RR track bike

  Ignore this member   
JSmooth


Expert Class
Posts: 169
posted March 01, 2011 07:35 AM        
I am just going to be sufficed with my ZX-14 and focus my attentions else where just found my bud who had an R1 saw the same add and went and bought the ZX12.
  Ignore this member   
SteveWFL


Moderator
Posts: 27920
posted March 02, 2011 08:02 AM        
I always remember the ZX12 as the gen1 busa's bitch, especially on the sales floor. maybe I'm wrong
____________
2010 Concours14
'08 R1 YAMAHA
ZX14 gone!
CBR600RR track bike

  Ignore this member   
JSmooth


Expert Class
Posts: 169
posted March 02, 2011 11:19 AM        Edited By: JSmooth on 2 Mar 2011 19:23
That may be so however I think if the ZX-14 kept the cylinder head from the ZX-12 and did a couple of other mods to it then we would see some better hp gains/torque, raise the limiter, and be able to work internally on our motors instead of having to find those select few that can the ZX-14 would be a far superior bike then the Hayabusa in every aspect. Like many have said why didn't they just make it a 1399 or 1440? You can still restrict it just make it tio where we can take off and hit the 60ft at 1.20 stock. So what's a few more CC's? I don't care for the selector switch that the Busa has cause either you can ride or you can't, don't need the slipper clutch I want to race, and lower it to about the same as the busa's ht you can keep the wt the same and give it a 2 longer wheel base and there you go!!!
  Ignore this member   
All times are America/Va < Previous Thread     Next Thread >
BIKELAND > FORUMS > ZX-14.com > Thread: Which Year ZX-10??? NEW TOPIC NEW POLL POST REPLY

FEATURED NEWS   Bikeland News RSS Feed

HEADLINES   Bikeland News RSS Feed


Copyright 2000-2026 Bikeland Media
Please refer to our terms of service for further information
0.2718288898468 seconds processing time