HOME ARTICLES JOIN GALLERY STORE SPONSORS MARKETPLACE CONTACT US  
Register | FAQ | Search | Memberlist
Username:    Password:       Forgot your password?
BIKELAND > FORUMS > ZX10R ZONE.com > Thread: Specs on the ER-6n NEW TOPIC NEW POLL POST REPLY
zxhoya


Zone Head
Posts: 631
posted November 28, 2005 02:33 PM        
Specs on the ER-6n

2005 - 2005 KAWASAKI ER-6n






Available from
Kawasaki, 01628-856750
Colours
Yellow, Black, Silver
Engine
649cc (86x60) liquid cooled 4-stroke fuel-injected parallel twin
Chassis
Diamond High tensile steel
Front suspension
41 mm telescopic fork
Rear suspension
Offset laydown single-shock with adjustable preload
Tyres
Dunlop D221, 120/70ZR17 front, 160/60ZR17 rear
Brakes
Dual semi-floating 300 mm petal discs two-piston calipers front, Single 220 mm petal disc single piston caliper rear
Power
72bhp
Torque
49ftlb
Weight, power-to-weight ratio
174kg
Acceleration (Standing 1/4-mile time, terminal speed)
N/A
Top speed
130mph
Geometry (Rake, trail, wheelbase)
24 degrees, 102m, 2100mm
Fuel consumption (Average mpg, tank capacity, range)
15.5l

This from MCN. Maybe the 10 & 14 specs are not far off.

____________
''The angle of my dangle is inversely proportional to the heat of my meat'' Will Ferrell

  Ignore this member   
kz2zx


Pro
Nobody in Particular
Posts: 1166
posted November 28, 2005 07:35 PM        
Power right there with the SV650 if that's SAE HP, torque close, and lighter by 51 lbs stock...

Might make a good LW Twins bike... my antenna are quivering...


  Ignore this member   
zxhoya


Zone Head
Posts: 631
posted November 28, 2005 07:47 PM        
Actually the SV650s is listed at 169kg and the SV650 is 165 dry.
____________
''The angle of my dangle is inversely proportional to the heat of my meat'' Will Ferrell

  Ignore this member   
kz2zx


Pro
Nobody in Particular
Posts: 1166
posted November 28, 2005 08:13 PM        
Really? I used Motorcyclist's numbers for the weight.


____________
ASMA 47
WERA 147

www.dhowellbooks.com

  Ignore this member   
zxhoya


Zone Head
Posts: 631
posted November 28, 2005 08:50 PM        
I went to suzuki's web site. Could be manufacturer b.s.
____________
''The angle of my dangle is inversely proportional to the heat of my meat'' Will Ferrell

  Ignore this member   
Mjollnir


Parking Attendant
Posts: 29
posted December 07, 2005 01:34 AM        
I had a short ride of one last week and it was, simply, fun. It would be a pretty cool bike to have if you have a lot of tight, twisty roads to ride on.

Actually, it would be a pretty cool bike to ride anywhere.

  Ignore this member   
Nukedog


Expert Class
Posts: 449
posted December 08, 2005 05:29 PM        
quote:
Power right there with the SV650 if that's SAE HP, torque close, and lighter by 51 lbs stock...



2006 SV650S Specs. And the SV is lighter by 5kg...



Specs
Engine: 645 cc, four-stroke, liquid cooled, 90° V-twin, DOHC, 8-valves, TSC
Bore Stroke: 81.0 x 62.6 mm
Compression Ratio: 11.5:1
Fuel System: Fuel Injection
Lubrication: Wet Sump
Ignition: Digital/Transistorized
Transmission: 6-speed
Final Drive: #525 chain
Overall Length: 2080 mm (81.9 in.)
Overall Width: 730 mm (28.7 in.)
Overall Height: 1170 mm (46.1 in.)
Seat Height: 800 mm (31.5 in.)
Ground Clearance: 155 mm (6.1 in.)
Wheelbase: 1430 mm (56.3 in.)
Dry Weight: 169 kg (372 lbs.)
Suspension Front: Telescopic, coil spring, oil damped, fully adjustable preload
Suspension Rear: Link-type, 7-way adjustable spring preload
Brakes Front: Dual hydraulic disc
Brakes Rear: Single hydraulic disc
Tires Front: 120/60-ZR17
Tires Rear: 160/60-ZR17
Fuel Tank Capacity: 17 liter (4.5 gal.) 16 liter (4.2 gal.) CA. model
Color: Blue, Red

____________
02 Busa...Turbo...
09 YZF-R6S...


  Ignore this member   
Nukedog


Expert Class
Posts: 449
posted December 08, 2005 05:30 PM        Edited By: Nukedog on 8 Dec 2005 17:31
And why would anyone get a slow 650 when you could get the SV1000S that only weighs 8kg more than thr Er6N or ER6R???
____________
02 Busa...Turbo...
09 YZF-R6S...


  Ignore this member   
kz2zx


Pro
Nobody in Particular
Posts: 1166
posted December 08, 2005 05:34 PM        
quote:
And why would anyone get a slow 650 when you could get the SV1000S that only weighs 8kg more than thr Er6N or ER6R???


To race?

I may be racing the EX650 in a spec class. The SV650 is nimble and light, and fits neatly into the LW classes.

Why would anyone race an SV1000 when the RC51, Aprilia Mille, and Duc 999 have it beaten before you even start?

If you're talking about the street, I am no longer qualified to answer.


____________
ASMA 47
WERA 147

www.dhowellbooks.com

  Ignore this member   
All times are America/Va < Previous Thread     Next Thread >
BIKELAND > FORUMS > ZX10R ZONE.com > Thread: Specs on the ER-6n NEW TOPIC NEW POLL POST REPLY

FEATURED NEWS   Bikeland News RSS Feed

HEADLINES   Bikeland News RSS Feed


Copyright 2000-2026 Bikeland Media
Please refer to our terms of service for further information
0.27308297157288 seconds processing time