quote:

---

That's it.

---

quote:

---

I've got a set of 10 wheels if you are looking for a set.

---

quote:

---

These are red. You'll have to use your stock rotors, ZX10 rotors do not work. Cush drive is included. I could include a new set of bearings so you can refinish them and then put new ones in.

I don't have pics at the moment. What's your email addy and where are you located?

---

quote:

---

factory red. I got them but never got around to getting brake, hanger and the install kit. I'm going a different route with my 14 and just taking up space.

---

quote:

---

These are red. You'll have to use your stock rotors, ZX10 rotors do not work. Cush drive is included. I could include a new set of bearings so you can refinish them and then put new ones in.

I don't have pics at the moment. What's your email addy and where are you located?

---

quote:

---

quote:

---

factory red. I got them but never got around to getting brake, hanger and the install kit. I'm going a different route with my 14 and just taking up space.

---

What year are they??

---

quote:

---

I thought about this kit too but the more I researched it, the more I disliked it. First of all, the weight savings is only about 2 pounds front and 5 pounds rear with about 1 pound of the rear savings in the rotor, where it makes the LEAST amount of difference. The front wheel is a direct swap so that is cost effective but the rear is not and requires a lot more parts and money to make it work. According to Michelin, just running a 1.5 pound lighter tire in the back will match (or possibly beat) the performance gain of the rear wheel swap (10 rear wheel on 14) based on their formulas of 1 pound shed in the tire = 3 pounds shed in the wheel and 4 pounds shed in the rotor.

So I decided to go with a 14 rear wheel and a 10 front wheel because that is the most cost effective solution and should help quicken my steering or at least require less effort to turn. I am also going with a lighter front tire which should help even more. So I will be losing about 3 rotating pounds up front in the wheel and tire where it matters most.

OSR quoted "close to 10lbs savings..." and "more than 7 pounds on the rear alone" but I challenged that claim and won. OSR has since revised their listing to reflect a more accurate weight savings which is only 5 pounds rear, not 7+ as originally advertised. OSR busted my chops about this but I was right all along and they "fixed" it after I complained and now they are refusing to sell me a kit because I gave them such a hard time (even though I was right and they "fixed" their listing). That shows me what type of people I am dealing with. I don't want to buy that kit anyway. It seems like a waste of money to me since the $125 saved can be put towards a lighter rear tire like a Michelin Power Pure 190/50/17 which is only about 12 pounds and my Shinko 009 190/50/17 rear tire is 14 pounds so that is a full 2 pound savings which translates into 6 pound savings in the wheel, thus effectively beating OSRs weight savings at a fraction of the cost.

Also, occasionally I see a fat dude with a fat chick on the back of his already heavy bike so would you trust a ZX-10R rear wheel in a situation like that? The Kawasaki Engineers made the 14 wheels stronger and heavier for a reason. They could have probably saved a lot of money just "slapping" 10 wheels on the 14 but then one lawsuit could have changed that all if the wheel failed on the 14 and someone got hurt and/or killed. I prefer the reassurance of the 14 rear wheel and mine doesn't seem as heavy as the one OSR weighed so the weight savings for me would be LESS than 5 pounds anyway.

---